The air-cooled 'A4 was much lighter and more portable than its M1917A1 water-cooled counterpart.
|
| Operation |
Fully automatic, recoil operated, air-cooled |
| Caliber |
.30 (7.62 mm) |
| Ammunition |
Ball M1; 174 gr bullet, 50 gr charge (.30-06) |
| Muzzle velocity |
853.4 mps (2800 fps) |
| Capacity | 250-round belt |
| Weight |
18.5 kg (41 lbs) with tripod |
| Overall length |
104.1 cm (41 in) |
| Rate of fire |
400 to 550 rounds per minute |
| Effective range |
1000m (1100 yds) |
Before the end of World War I, the U.S. Ordnance
Department recognized that water-cooled machine guns took up too
much space inside a tank. Consequently, the water-cooled M1917 was
converted to an air-cooled model by surrounding the barrel with a
perforated metal jacket.
As World War II approached, the Ordnance
Department was committed to developing an air-cooled machine gun
for infantry use. The result was the M1919A4.
At 41 lbs for gun and tripod, the M1919A4 was much lighter than the
water-cooled M1917A1 (93 lbs for gun and tripod). On the other hand,
the air-cooled weapon was unable to maintain the same level of sustained
fire as the water-cooled M1917A1, and did not have the steadiness of
accuracy as the heavier weapon. But its light weight and ease of set-up
made it much more useful as an offensive weapon than the water-cooled guns.
In fixed defensive positions, however, the water-cooled M1917A1 saw much
use in Korea. With anti-freeze in the water jacket, the heavy MG was more
reliable in intense Chosin cold, as was particularly observed in the savage Reservoir battles. In any weather, the heavy was also more stable and, under intense attack, its greater sustained volume of fire was much appreciated.
Moreover, the A4 was crticized for slowness of set-up and vulnerability of crew. To meet these
weaknesses, the M1919A6 was developed, and saw use in WWII, Korea and Vietnam.
|
|