The Battle For Seoul
Brigadier General Edwin H. Simmons - USMC (Retired)
Director of Marine Corps History and Museums
Addressing Amphibious Warfare School
Quantico - Virginia - 15 March 1985
Thirty-five years ago, I was sitting where you are sitting today. I was a
member of what was then called the "Amphibious Warfare School, Junior Course."
The student body was made up of first lieutenants, captains, and majors. The
Amphibious Warfare School, Senior Course, corresponds to today's Command and
Staff College and had lieutentant colonels as students.
On graduation I was ordered to the 2nd Marine Division at Camp Lejeune. So
were a good number of my classmates. I was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 6th
Marines; and as a major, was given command of Weapons Company. The battalion had
just come back from the Mediterranean and we were still unpacking expeditionary
boxes when, on 25 June, the North Koreans crossed the 38th Parallel. In short
order we moved west on a troop train to Camp Pendleton where we became the 3d
Battalion, 1st Marines, with about ten days to build from our half-strength
peacetime tables of organization to war-time strength, before sailing from San
Diego. Our regimental commander was Colonel "Chesty" Puller. We landed at Inchon
on 15 September and that was the first we saw of the 5th Marines which had come
up from the Pusan Perimeter. We did not see the 7th Marines until we reached
Seoul.
We were successful at Inchon and Seoul - and that success I think can be
attributed to the quality of leadership at all levels. From the division
commander, Major General Oliver P. Smith, on down, virtually every officer and
non-commissioned officer was a World War II veteran. In my company I had
corporals who could do a platoon sergeant's job and do it well, and in fact were
so soon doing. The Reserves that filled up our ranks at Camp Pendleton were
outstanding - indistinguishable from the Regulars.
Also, a great advantage we had was that a remarkable number of the officer's
knew each other well even though the Division had come together on the
battlefield. A large proportion of the captains and majors had just graduated,
as I, from the Junior Course.
I don't know what you have in your syllabus now, but in those days we spent a
good deal of time with the fundamentals of tactics and techniques, with many,
many map exercises, command post exercises, and field exercises. We knew the
school solution and we were ready to apply it.
In an infantry battalion of that time there were three rifle companies - we
would soon learn that we needed four rifle companies - a weapons company, and a
headquarters and service company. In my weapons company I had a heavy machine
gun platoon - the heavy machine gun of the day was the water-cooled .30 caliber
Browning, a superb weapon - an 81mm mortar platoon, and an anti-tank-assault
platoon. The anti-tank platoon had 3.5-inch rocket launchers - which we just
gotten to replace our 2.36-inch launchers - flame throwers, and demolitions. As
Weapons Company commander I was also the battalion's Supporting Arms
Coordinator. I am a believer in weapons companies and I am a believer in organic
supporting arms coordinators.
Now for the Battle for Seoul.
You have heard the broad outlines of the battle. Now I will tell you how it
was at the company and battalion level, at least how it was at my company, and
my battalion level. Here I want to say, and those of you who have been in combat
already know this, that every man has his own war, his own battle. I am speaking
today not as a historian but as a participant. A historian can be objective. A
participant cannot; he can only be subjective. I will tell you of the battle
from my own narrow perspective.
We had landed, as I have said, at Inchon on 15 September. In the advance on
Seoul, the 5th Marines were on the left and the 1st Marines on the right. The
5th Marines took Kimpo Airfield on the 17th and crossed the Han River northwest
of Seoul on the 20th. They would have three days of hard fighting taking the
high ground immediately northwest of Seoul. Meanwhile, the 7th Marines had
unloaded at Inchon the afternoon of the 21st and reached Kimpo that evening. The
1st Marines crossed the river on the 24th and the next day, 25 September, both
the 1st and 5th regiments went into the city itself. The 7th Marines, in
reserve, crossed the river and took up a position behind the 5th Marines.
General Almond, the X Corps commander, who on 21 September took personal command
of the operations ashore, ordered the U.S. Army's 32d Infantry Regiment,
followed by the 17th ROK Regiment, also to cross the Han on 25 September and
occupy "South Mountain" to the east of Seoul. The North Korean commander, Major
General Wol Ki Chan, had chosen to ignore the occupation of South Mountain and
concentrated his forces first on the high ground northwest of Seoul and then on
the defense of the city itself. For this he had about 10,000 troops. At the
battalion and company level we were only dimly aware of these developments.
Our attack began at 0700 on the 25th. RCT-1, with the 2d KMC Battalion
attached, was given a zone of action about a mile wide going right through the
center of the city to the high ground to the northeast. The 2d KMC Battalion was
to mop up behind us and then revert to its own regimental control. The 5th
Marines were to come into the city on our left from the northwest and the 7th
Marines, committed to combat for the first time, were to the north and left of
the 5th Marines.
The mission assigned the 3d Battalion, 1st Marines, was to advance along the
axis of Ma Po Boulevard to seize Duksoo Palace, taking the railroad station en
route. To give you an analogy: this was rather like crossing the Anacostia River
and moving up Pennsylvania Avenue to capture the Captitol, taking Union Station
along the way. And we had to do this in one day. General Almond wanted the city
secured by 26 September.
We had heavy going all day. George and How Companies were in the assault,
with George on the left and on Ma Po Boulevard itself. Item Company was in
reserve. As Weapons Company Commander and Supporting Arms Coordinator I had a
most frustrating day as we were operating under a very restrictive fire plan.
Damage to the city and civilian casualties were to be held to a minimum; hence,
we could not get artillery support, except for directly observed targets and we
could not get close air support at all. Our Corsairs had done a superb job from
Inchon to Seoul, but air was ruled out of the picture once we got into the city
itself.
I want you to visualize Ma Po Boulevard. It was a wide avenue. Seoul, of
course, was a much less modern city than it is now. Ma Po Boulevard was a
solidly built up street, mostly two and three story structures of stucco or
masonry construction, and occasional more impressive buildings - churches,
hospitals, and so on - often enclosed with a walled compound. The street itself
was interrupted by repeated echelons of barricades. These barricades were made
for the most part of large rice straw bags filled with earth. Other reports to
the contrary, you didn't blow up these barricades or push them aside. They were
much too heavy and inert for that. We had to contend with them in place. Not all
of them were defended. Those that were defended had long-barreled Soviet-made
anti-tank guns - 45mm if my memory serves me - heavy water-cooled Maxim machine
guns - the equivalent of our Brownings - and rather awkward looking anti-tank
rifles. There were also plenty of small arms fire and sniping from all sides.
You have heard that we went through the interior walls of the buildings.
Perhaps there was some of that but I saw none of it. The house-to-house fighting
was chiefly a matter of grenades, M-1 rifles, and BAR automatic fire.
We had the intermittent support of tanks. The battle tank was the M-26
Pershing and our tankers had received them just before the Inchon landing. The
tanks were at their best when they were being used as an assault gun. They were
in direct support of us rather than attached; therefore, they came and went
pretty much as they pleased. Back at the Junior Course we had frequently argued
the respective merits of supporting arms assigned - that is, organic - or
attached. This was particularly true when our battalion was operating
more-or-less independently which was a good part of the time.
By the middle of the afternoon the situation was about as follows:
George Company had reached what the company commander thought was Duksoo
Palace, but could not get across a small bridge to get to it.
How Company had reached a railroad station but the company commander was
having a hard time convincing anyone he was there because the map would indicate
that the railroad station was to the right of George Comapny and he was
insisting that he was in front of George Company and that George was calling
down artillery fire on him.
Our battalion commander, Lieutenant Colonel Tom Ridge, sent me forward to see
if I could straighten things out. I found the George Company commander in a
highly agitated state. I also found that he was very wrong in his map reading.
he was about a mile short of Duksoo Palace. What was in front of him was
something else. We later found out that it was a girl's school. I said "Let's
make one more try to get across the bridge." I couldn't get him an artillery
preparation, but I promised to give him the best I had with my 81mm mortars
which were close behind George Company. We drenched the other side of the bridge
with a couple hundred 81 mortar shells, but the attack failed. George Company
commander was nearly distraught. He said, "Take my bars, I've had it."
All of this was reported to Colonel Ridge who ordered me to stay with George
Company and to organize the defense for the night. I put a road block across the
boulevard on our side of the bridge, manning it with two rifle squads, a heavy
machine gun section, a rocket squad, and a 75mm recoilless rifle section from
the regimental Antitank Company. Our attached engineers put in a field of
anti-tank mines on the bridge itself. There was a section of tanks with us and I
asked them to stay, but they said they had to go back to re-arm and re-fuel and
they would see us in the morning.
There was a sizable hill to the left rear of the road block with a house on
it. George Company set up its command post in the cellar of the house. I
established the battalion observation post - that is to say, my radio operator,
my runner, and myself immediately in front of the house. Behind me was a set of
steps that led down into the cellar. Item Company was on the high ground on the
right of the battalion sector and How Company, which had become disorganized
during the day, was to fill in the center of our position. The battalion CP was
about a half mile to the rear in a brick-walled compound.
My communications consisted of the normal radio nets - we were then using the
SCR-300 - and wire from the OP back to the battalion switchboard and also direct
lines from the OP to the 81mm mortar battery position which was about 150 yards
to the rear of the road block.
At about midnight Colonel Ridge ordered me to send out a patrol to make
contact with a similar patrol which was being sent out by 5th Marines. I could
hear heavy firing to my left front and it was obvious that the 5th Marines were
heavily engaged. I doubted if a patrol could get to them. I was told to send out
the patrol anyway. I formed up a patrol, under a Corporal Collins, of eight
Marines from George Company, three young Koreans who had joined us, and a Marine
from Weapons Company to guide them through the minefield we had laid on the
bridge. I felt I was kissing them goodbye.
The patrol got off at about twelve-forty-five. Almost immediately I received
another call from battalion. We were to jump off in a night attack at 0130. I
argued the point. A night attack? Without reconnaissance or a rehearsal? What
were our objectives?
Unknown to me, Colonel Ridge had already made these same arguments to Colonel
Puller who had already made them to General Smith who had already made them to
General Almond, but General Almond was adament. In late evening an aerial
reconnaissance report had told him that the enemy was streaming northward out of
the city. At 2009 he had sent the following message to General Smith:
"You will push attack now to the limit of your objectives in order to
insure maximum destruction of enemy forces. [Signed] Almond."
I was told that the attack would be preceded by an intensive 15-minute
artillery preparation. About this time I heard a fire fight to my front and I
knew my patrol had been intercepted. Several members of the patrol filtered back
across the bridge reporting that they had been ambushed,
I was sitting in the open, getting ready for the jump-off, when I heard the
sound of armor clanking down Ma Po Boulevard. I flashed a mechanized warning
over the tactical net and then reached for my hotline to the road block. As I
did so the lead tank fired its first round. These were Soviet-made T-34s with
85mm guns. That first round cracked behind me as I dived for the cellar steps.
My radio operator did not follow me. That first round had gone right through
him. Like for us, it was apparently SOP for the North Korean tankers to have an
armor-piercing round in their tank chamber. If it had been high-explosive shell
rather than AP I would have been dead.
I asked that the artillery preparation which had gotten ready for our attack
be fired and in minutes it came thundering down on the enemy column.
A short while later a sergeant telephoned me from the road block that they
had knocked out the lead tank with a combination of 75mm recoilless, 3.5-inch
rocket, and heavy machine gun fire. The lieutenant in charge of the road block
was wounded and he, Sergeant Caldwell, had taken over.
At about 0230 enemy small arms reached a crescendo and I began hearing the
distinctive brrrp brrrp of their sub-machine guns signalizing the
beginning of their assault. I estimated that we were being attacked by at least
a battalion supported by 10 to 12 tanks. All this time our artillery had
continued to fire. I asked that they shorten their range to the minimum that
would clear the mask of high ground we were occupying. The 81mm mortars were
already firing at minimum range. This high-angle fire plus heavy fire from
George Company and my heavy machine guns broke up the assault.
At about 0315 the artillery liaison officer telephoned me that they would
have to cease barrage fire or the tubes of their guns would burn out. As soon as
the artillery stopped firing, the tanks started moving again. In the light of
the burning buildings I could see three of them clearly, rolling forward on Ma
Po Boulevard about 500 yards to my front. I asked for renewed artillery fire.
While waiting for it, I engaged the tanks with two of my heavy machine guns. I
could see my tracers whanging off the face plates of the tanks. This
momentarily silenced the tanks. I asked for and was given the fires of a 155mm
battery. I adjusted the fires on the tanks and asked that the guns be held on
target for a repeat if necessary. The 155mm fire crippled the tanks, apparently
making them immobile, but they continued to fire. Luckily for us they were
shooting high and the rounds were going over our heads.
I was worried over what would happen when daylight came and they could see to
adjust their shooting. I also wondered if they could get together for another
infantry assault. I called battalion and asked them to find out what time would
be first light. The answer that came back was, as I remember, 0526. I called
down to the road block and asked that a 75mm recoilless rifle be sent up to me
on the hill. By this time only one enemy gun was still firing at us. Afterward I
learned that it was a self-propelled 76mm gun, a near-twin to the T-34 tank. I
pointed it out to the recoilless rifle gunner and told him to shoot as soon as
there was enough light to get a clear sight picture. I told him he would get
only one chance. He did as he was told and we got the gun. However, we were so
intent on getting off that round we forgot about the back blast of the
recoilless rifle. It bounced of the mud-and-wattle side of the house behind us
and knocked us head-over-heals. We thought it very funny at the time. And that
is how the night ended.
Throughout the night, First Sergeant Rocco Zullo of George Company had been a
paragon of leadership, striding up and down the line ensuring that his riflemen
stayed in action. I was also tremendously proud of my machine gunners. I had ten
heavy machine guns on the line and during the night they fired 120 boxes - that
is to say 30,000 rounds - of ammunition. Four of those guns were
with me on the hill and they fired 80 boxes - 20,000 - of those rounds. But not
all men, not even all Marines, are brave in combat. As daylight came, many of
the bodies huddled in the foxholes that I thought dead popped up out of their
holes like so many prairie dogs.
Four battalions of artillery had fired for us and I was told we emptied out
all the shells of their on-postion reserves as well as an Army supply point.
In the full flush of morning I was ordered to send out a patrol to ascertain
the damge we had done and what still remained in front of us. A section of
Marine tanks came rumbling up from the rear. I formed a tank-infantry patrol
with the tanks and a half-strength platoon. Our engineers went out on the bridge
to pick up the unexploded mines. They found them all except, as it turned out,
one. The patrol went forward and - you guessed it - one of the tanks hit the
missing mine. The rifle platoon took something like 19 casualties, almost as
many as the whole night's fighting cost us.
When we got through counting we put the score at seven tanks, two
self-propelled guns, and eight anti-tank guns. We also swept up 83 prisoners. I
put the enemy dead at about 250; someone else higher up raised the figure to 475
to 500.
That was the end of the heavy fighting in Seoul. The city was declared secure
on 27 September, and three days later, as you have heard, President Syngman Rhee
and General Douglas MacArthur made a triumphal re-entry into the capital.
Marines would not again be engaged in serious urban combat until the Tet
Offensive of 1968 and the Battle for Hue. Coincidentally, the Marines in the
Battle for Hue would again be battalions from the 1st and 5th Regiments. There
are similarities and there are differences in the two battles. I think it would
be very instructive if you were to have a panel of battalion commanders and
company commanders from these two battles discuss them with you. Such battalion
and company commanders are available in the Washington area.
|